RELIGIOUS LIBERTY UNDER ATTACK

NEWS ALERT!!!

As regular subscribers to my blog know, one issue that appears often is attacks on our religious liberty as practicing Catholics.  The news story copied below just came to my attention in the Archdiocese of St. Louis.

Under the guises of “discrimination” jargon, the City of St. Louis will consider a Bill to protect abortion in every way possible by man-made laws.

“Euphemism is a literary term to describe the substitution of a mild, safe, indirect, or vague expression for one thought to be offensive, harsh, or unacceptable.

Here are some of the more popular euphemisms:  Women’s Reproductive Health (abortion); Death with Dignity (euthanasia); Marriage Equality (same sex marriage); Locker Room Talk (sexual assault) Gender Equality (denial of birth gender and God the Creator of Gender)” (From my blog Language of Opposition)

We must be on our guard and speak truth to power.  We live in a very dangerous world that support their secular agendas  through , organization, lobbying, and passing laws that ignore morality but serve their self interests.

These proponents of secular agendas do not like the Catholic Church, the loudest voice that speaks out in opposition to the ensnarement of the world, the flesh, and the devil.  Jesus was counter cultural.  His Church is counter-cultural.

Do not be fooled by polls that say what Catholics in name only support.  Stay vigilant!  Persevere in what your faith, conscience and the Spirit of Truth is telling you.

Pray for the world as Jesus prays for His disciples in the Garden of Gethsemane, “Father, I do not ask that you take them out of the world but that you keep them from the evil one.They do not belong to the world any more than I belong to the world. Consecrate them in the truth. Your word is truth. As you sent me into the world, so I sent them into the world…that we may all be one as you Father are in me and I in you.” John 17:20-22

ST.LOUIS REVIEW (ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. LOUIS)

SUBMITTED ON JANUARY 10, 2017

By Jennifer Brinker

A proposed city ordinance seeks to make the City of St. Louis a “sanctuary for abortion,” said Archbishop Robert J. Carlson, who called the measure an attack on the “most deeply held moral and religious convictions of the people of this great city.”

Board Bill 203 would amend the city’s anti-discrimination law and add pregnancy and reproductive health decisions as protected classes. The bill, sponsored by Alderwoman Megan E. Green (D-15th Ward), has been referred to the city’s Housing, Urban Development and Zoning Committee.

Reproductive health decisions, as defined by the measure, would include any decision related to to the use or intended use of any drug, device or medical service, including use of contraception or fertility control, or planned abortion.

The proposal would affect employers, organizations and individuals, prohibiting them from discriminating against people or entities that make decisions related to abortion, birth control or artificial reproduction services.

The bill does not provide an exemption for churches, religious organizations or individuals who have a conscientious objection. That means a Catholic school or Catholic Charities agency could be fined by the City of St. Louis for not employing persons who publicly promote practices such as abortion. Catholic institutions also could be fined for not including coverage for abortion in their insurance plans.

If passed, the Archdiocese of St. Louis will not comply with the ordinance, which “attempts to force the Church and others to become unwilling participants in the abortion business,” Archbishop Carlson said in a statement. “There is no room for compromise on such a matter. This is a matter of fundamental religious and moral beliefs.”

“I urge the citizens of St. Louis to oppose Board Bill 203,” Archbishop Carlson continued. “Protection and care for human life at all stages of development from conception until natural death is a fundamental moral value shared by Catholics as well as many other people of faith. City ordinances should respect all people, including women facing unplanned pregnancies, unborn children, and people who desire to live their lives in accordance with their religious convictions.”

A second bill was expected to have been filed this week to create a buffer zone at Planned Parenthood in St. Louis. Sponsored by Alderwoman Christine Ingrassia (D-6th Ward), the measure would create a buffer zone at the driveway entrance to the clinic. Ingrassia said she believes people have the “right to assemble” but that the measure would address some of the more “aggressive” activity on the sidewalk in front of the clinic.

Missouri Right to Life issued a statement Jan. 4, which called the efforts a measure to “take away certain citizens’ ability to exercise their constitutional right to freedom of religion and freedom of speech.”

While this is the first time in recent history that measures regarding reproductive health decisions are being considered by St. Louis City officials, it is part of a growing trend emerging in cities across the United States in recent years. Bills regulating speech regarding pregnancy options, for example, have been proposed in Baltimore, Maryland; Montgomery County Maryland; and in Austin, Texas.

“You see these types of bills and they take different flavors — buffer zones, disclosure at pregnancy centers, referral for abortion at pregnancy centers — and the pro-abortion forces work strategically where they have the votes,” said Deacon Sam Lee, a pro-life lobbyist with Campaign Life Missouri in Jefferson City, Mo. “It’s going to be in relatively few (state) legislatures, but more so in the number of municipalities or local governments where they have more support.”

The archbishop called on St. Louis to be a “sanctuary for life and compassion, especially compassion for mothers and their developing children.

“Rather than aiding and abetting the abortion industry, the archdiocese, through its various ministries and programs, will continue to extend both spiritual and material assistance to all those in need, especially the poor and those women facing crisis pregnancies who feel they have no one else to turn to for help — both during their pregnancies as well as after their child is born,” he said.